![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg_0XQGJZM4kSJGhBds6r9cUXoRash0jIi_HltzbL4KH7PgkbtJde-L2tLFgBnhUihlcsZF2hwpsS_VH5aMb0CLOfK3v6Jvh_FFSnEEmGZSiVMFG_nNG2DjkdNeAuAH6b4wiK-OnTRTfEVz/s200/Pennsylvania_State_University_seal.svg.png)
Over at Forbes, I wrote this morning about why aspects of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania's decision in the 'Penn State' case were wrongly decided. In the article, I explain that the court made dubious presumptions that the NCAA is not a commercial actor (a longstanding mistake of the Third Circuit) and that the NCAA president's actions are not innately concerted.
Here is a link to the full article, discussing both points in far greater detail.